Due to its special natural and geographical conditions, the city of Tonekabon is susceptible to many shocks, including earthquakes and floods, which brings the need to pay attention to urban resilience. The present study was conducted to analyze the STATE of urban neighborhoods from the perspective of urban resilience components. This research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical method. The research's statistical population was comprised of citizens living in Tonekabon city. Using Cochran's formula, the statistical sample size was estimated to be 384 people. The data collection tool was a questionnaire, the validity of which was verified in the form of face and face validity, as well as divergent validity and reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability. Analysis of data and information was done using SPSS and PLS software programs. The findings of this research showed that the overall resilience of Tonekabon city is in an unfavorable situation. In such a way, the average experimental value obtained for the overall resilience of the city and its dimensions was lower than the average value of 3. Among the localities of the studied area, Karim Abad neighborhood, in which the overall average obtained was equal to 2.78, was in a better condition than other localities, and Tonekabon neighborhood, according to the average (2.39), was in an unfavorable condition among the studied localities. Among the other research findings, among the components of urban resilience, the physical factor with a path coefficient of 0.490 has the most significant impact and was ranked first, followed by the economic factor with a path coefficient of 0.348. In third place is the administrative, institutional factor with a path coefficient of 0.327 and in fourth place is the social dimension with a path coefficient of 0.264.

In this article, at first, I have explained correspondence theory of truth and I have dealt with its problems. Then I have explained the truth maker principle in the light of correspondence theory of truth. At the end, I have discussed how this theory can support negative proposition.

"The Welfare AFFAIRS" are the complement of employment operations and play a drastic role in keeping and creating motivation in human sources of Social Insurance Organization. The organization undertakes 32000 staff working in insurance, meditative units and the responsibility of almost 7 Million basic insured in social insurance affair is overshadowed by the above mentioned drastic role.Consequently, the situation of the welfare AFFAIRS in the operation of the Organization .and as a result, securing the agreement of almost 28 million insured and their family will be gained. So, in order to recognize the situation of welfare AFFAIRS of staff, the present research is carried out by the order of Social Insurance Organization. To articulate the discussed phenomenon scientifically, the theories related to the management fields are used in spite of the fact that the research method has been descriptive. The means of collecting the information have been the pre-made interview, statistical society and the staff of the social insurance branches of the 7 provinces have been selected with a meaningful sample size by random sampling. The important questions in the study are as follows:1. What cases are provided for the staff?2. At which level are the staff satisfied with these AFFAIRS related to some variants?3. What is the relationship between the opinion of the staff about the welfare AFFAIRS and some variants?The operate and theoretical explanations of each variant has been presented and the mode of its measurement has been shown as well 25 cases of the welfare AFFAIRS and 15 cases of the staff opinions have been tested.Some of the conclusions are as follows:1. The most usable welfare facilities which are known as the best by the staff, are noncash aids and the job - making loan including the urgent loan.2. The most satisfaction of the used welfare AFFAIRS is related to the job - making loans, holiday homes and pilgrim houses, and the least one is related to the cooperative expense, loan of residence and dinning saloons.3. The relationship between satisfaction level of the total welfare facilities with age, literacy level, job background, organizational unit and social class is ratified but the gender, family size, organizational unit and the degree of enjoying the welfare facility of place of residence is not approved.4. The opinion of staff about the welfare AFFAIRS is not related to the organizational unit, gender and job background, while this relationship with social base, satisfaction level of welfare AFFAIRS, literacy level and age is approved.Finally, an appropriated operational suggestion with the conclusion of study has been presented.

The lands conquered by Muslims out of Saudi Arabia Peninsula differed in different fields including civilized organs and finance regulations. Muslims, exercising general Islamic rules in official and financial AFFAIRS, used native regulations on behalf of their interests. Muslim governors of Iran, because of its background in civilization, met a fairly all-embraced, but particularly complicated system of financial and economic AFFAIRS. Yet, their interests did not permit them to change the system in a short time. Therefore, they kept the system, particularly in two sub-fields of official system for receiving the STATE’s rights, and of tax system for the land owners containing amount, manner and time of receiving. In the paper, the effect of Sasanid’s finance and official system on the finance system of Califs STATE, and the role of Iranians in managing it have been studied. It has been made clear that at least to the end of the first century of Hijrah, not only Iranian finance officials were put to receive the STATE’s rights and compile finance documents, but also the official language was Persian and finally it was Iranians themselves who translated them into Arabic.

The Present article studies epistemological and sociological dimensions of feminism theories, using documentary and analytical methods, to examine the relationship between Feminism as an emancipatory social movement and the problem of human TOTALITY. The most important criticism about views of modern and postmodern feminism movements is related to their inability to provide a general concept for the emancipation of human subject and, conversely, construct a basic gap between the two halves of human being. These two currents of thought which have been influenced by different socio- epistemological conditions especially due to changing conditions of the last years of the century and formation of Post feminism theories are subject to criticizing and rethinking. Post feminism has different tendencies, one tendency is, basically, denying the feminist achievements and announces its obsoleteness, but the other tendency, is trying to provide a relevant perspective for paying attention to emancipation of women and the TOTALITY of human being, simultaneously. In the present paper, this critical and continuing tendency has been studied in terms of their ways of constructing the dual subject of human being.

The marine environment and exploitation of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf under the rule of law of the coastal STATE are a function of the provisions of Convention of the Law of the Sea. Hence, the criminal jurisdiction of the coastal STATE on third-country flag STATE in the exclusive economic zone and the Free Seas is prohibited in most cases. Seizure of a foreign ship and the arrest of a foreign crew in offshore areas by the coastal STATE is STATE intervention in the administration of the flag STATE and exercises its sovereignty. Involvement of coastal STATE in dealing with illegal ship operations in offshore areas is limited to the provisions of articles 73 and 101 Convention of the Law of the Sea on marine living resources or piracy. Extension of the offshore jurisdiction of the coastal STATE in the use of un-living resources or the operation of oil platforms, where illegal activities by foreign ships and crew of foreign citizenship are not adapted to the provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea. Judicial procedure of the Arbitration Tribunal and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on case of Arctic Sunrise ship also confirmed this theory.

Today it is clear that both modernizing and smartening tax system cause to increase tax revenues and moves the country's economy towards transparency and tax justice. This article aims at presenting a paradigmatic model of the organizational architecture of tax AFFAIRS based on the information technology governance in the STATE tax organization by using data method, a qualitative research method based on the theory derived from data (including open, central and selective coding stages) and using the Strauss and Corbin's systematic approach to collect data from in-depth and semi-structured interviews using purposeful snowball sampling with a number of 15 interviews (to the saturation stage) of managers and experts.

The focus of this study is primarily on “the discrepancy in mentality as an important factor affecting family problems and divorce”. For this purpose, some minor studies were conducted each of which experimentally examined different aspects of mental discrepancy in Iranian families. Almost all of these studies showed that permanent disputes and divorces resulted from the differences in their world-views, thinkings, and impressions in their mutual AFFAIRS. At last, the theory of Homogamy with two major revisions were used to explain the reasons and causes of family problems and divorce which were confirmed in minor studies and cases.

Our main aim in this article is to analyze the two concepts “proposition” and “STATE of AFFAIRS”. First we present the minimal expectations of a theory of “proposition” and a theory of “STATE of AFFAIRS”, and then we turn to the views of the contemporary theorist John Pollock regarding these two topics and present the most important of his views on the subject. Subsequently, we reconstruct a theory of “proposition” and a theory of “STATE of AFFAIRS” on the basis of Pollock's ideas. According to this reconstructed theory, “propositions” and “STATEs of AFFAIRS” are necessary mind-independent entities such that the senses of “logical operators”, “concepts” and “designators” can be their constituents. These constituents, by being arranged in a particular logical form, form propositions or STATEs of AFFAIRS. There is no ontological difference between a proposition and a STATE of AFFAIRS, but rather they only differ in their logical forms. At the end of the article we evaluate the power of our theory in satisfying the minimal expectations for a theory of “propositions” and “STATEs of AFFAIRS”.